Reinventing Icons: How Partnership Powers Brand Transformation
An honest, high-energy conversation about what it really takes to keep iconic brands relevant, resonant, and relentlessly modern.Read More
An honest, high-energy conversation about what it really takes to keep iconic brands relevant, resonant, and relentlessly modern.Read More
Uncover the driving factors showing fans how taking care of their minds sets them up to succeed in life.Read More
Havas CEO Yannick Bolloré on Monday shut down speculation that his company was exploring a deal with WPP, telling employees in an internal memo that the French holding group is […]Read More
Walmart revealed its collaboration with Dr. Suess Enterprises for its holiday campaign back in October, set in the magical world of “WhoKnewVille.” Today, the retailer shared that the Grinch of […]Read More
MS NOW’s new space, which previously belonged to BuzzFeed News, was chosen because it already met the necessary requirements for studio space.Read More
From subscription to freedom with Raina Enand, the meal delivery service’s head of marketing.Read More
Lubar’s departure comes weeks after reports speculated DDB could be retired following Omnicom’s acquisition of IPGRead More
Marshall Sahlins and others showed that early hunter gatherer societies generally didn’t work very hard. Two or three hours a day were spent gathering food, and the rest of the time was for social engagement and family.
With all the technology and innovation that has followed, why do we work four times as hard?
One reason is leverage. The tools we have offer apparently bigger prizes in exchange for the next unit of incremental labor. There wasn’t a point in working harder to get more berries, because you already had enough berries.
And the second reason is that the systems that created our culture have their own needs in mind. Landlords don’t provide housing as a public service–they do it to make a profit. And the wedding-industrial complex makes happy brides as a byproduct of making a profit. They’re the side effect, not the point.
Systems use status and affiliation within culture to motivate individuals to play along.
When it’s working as we hope, the system of systems produces possibility, civility and achievement. It increases health, connection and even joy.
But no one is in charge of these systems, and, especially as they become concentrated and powerful, they often fail to produce the outcomes we might be hoping for.
Many are intransigent and sticky, and they work hard to remain invisible. When we see the systems, we have a chance to do something about them. The hard part is organizing the community to push back before the new normal becomes permanent.
When brands talk about using AI, most describe some version of making content faster, cheaper, or “more personalized.” Heather Salkin and Jason Snyder think that approach is already stale. Their […]Read More
New agents will live within Yahoo’s demand-side platform, where advertisers can also integrate their own custom AI tools.Read More